Comments on: Foundation Three – Lawful Polygamy https://parables.blog/foundation-three-lawful-polygamy/ Sat, 26 Sep 2020 07:32:18 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: Joseph Herrin https://parables.blog/foundation-three-lawful-polygamy/#comment-2784 Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:33:18 +0000 #comment-2784 Dear Robin,

You wrote:

"I'm confused, how can a woman be a polygamist if she can have only one man at a time? And only if her husband is dead, can she even re-marry?"

The term polygamy in its standard English sense refers to a man OR A WOMAN having more than one spouse.

You are correct in that the Scriptures forbid this of women, but that does not keep it from being practiced. One commenter to this post referred to the practice as "serial polygamy." I think that defines it well. For in Yahweh's eyes the man and woman are still joined to one another even after divorce.

]]>
By: Robin J. Wade https://parables.blog/foundation-three-lawful-polygamy/#comment-2783 Sat, 03 Oct 2009 08:21:51 +0000 #comment-2783 You stated Joseph this statement, "We see then, that in God’s eyes the nations we live in (I live in America) have declared polygamy to be legal, and many men (and women) are practicing polygamists. They have married more than one spouse, and these spouses are living."

I'm confused, how can a woman be a polygamist if she can have only one man at a time? And only if her husband is dead, can she even re-marry? I must have missed something! Just to encourage you, I so enjoy your writings & this one is exceptional. For me it is easy to read, but so full of Truth! I have passed these Marriage Covenant Articles on to those on my list of friends. Thank you for allowing these Truths to be shared. Robin J. Wade

]]>
By: Joseph Herrin https://parables.blog/foundation-three-lawful-polygamy/#comment-2782 Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:36:13 +0000 #comment-2782 You asked:

"Does this mean if a single never-been-married woman has intercourse with a married man (let's just say she has fallen in love with him), that the man is not committing adultury in God's eyes (because she never has had a husband), and also she is not committing adultury either for the same reason? Wouldn't God consider this Fornication on the woman's part, because she is having sex outside of marriage?"

It would be considered fornication on both the man and the woman's part. To engage in sexual intercourse outside of marriage is fornication, and this is condemned in both the Old and the New Testament.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10
Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither FORNICATORS, nor idolaters, nor ADULTERERS, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

Fornicators are lumped together with adulterers and many other transgressors. The consequences are most severe. To not inherit the kingdom of God is the ultimate loss. It is that which is described by the words, "they shall be cast into outer darkness. There shall be weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth."

]]>
By: Anonymous https://parables.blog/foundation-three-lawful-polygamy/#comment-2781 Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:40:28 +0000 #comment-2781 Does this mean if a single never-been-married woman has intercourse with a married man (let's just say she has fallen in love with him), that the man is not committing adultury in God's eyes (because she never has had a husband), and also she is not committing adultury either for the same reason? Wouldn't God consider this Fornication on the woman's part, because she is having sex outside of marriage?

]]>
By: Joseph Herrin https://parables.blog/foundation-three-lawful-polygamy/#comment-2780 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:15:40 +0000 #comment-2780 Dear Brother,

You asked about the reason "why" there is a double standard. The answer was shared in the article. It has to do with the creation of man and woman. Man was created to be the image and glory of God and follows the pattern of God. Man was not created for woman, but woman for man.

May you be blessed with peace and understanding in these days.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://parables.blog/foundation-three-lawful-polygamy/#comment-2779 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:51:33 +0000 #comment-2779 Don't let the feminists of today read this, they might go insane. I have an interesting question for you. I am always interested in 'why' things are as they are – I realize that in dealing with God it is not really my place to wonder why – but I want to know if you have any insight as to why the double standard? We could come to know more about God if we were to understand the why in this situation.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://parables.blog/foundation-three-lawful-polygamy/#comment-2778 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:44:01 +0000 #comment-2778 I always read Timothy and Titus at face value and thought Paul was talking about one wife verses multiple wives. Of course, I was quickly put in my place and told Paul was saying a leader couldn't be divorced. I am convinced if that is what the Lord meant, He would have clearly stated that. Instead men have superimposed their own morays onto scripture beacause the scripture didn't conviently fit their world view. Well, this is not the first time the Lord has spoken something people found objectionalbe and hard to understand. If I'm not mistaken Jesus said "Unless you eat my flesh and drink my blood, you have no part in me," and when he said that many disciples left him saying "this is a hard teaching, who can accept it" Let's not toss out the word because we don't understand, let's let the Father reveal His truth in His words. Like Peter said, "Where can we go? You(Jesus)alone have the words of Life."

Blessings

]]>
By: Joseph Herrin https://parables.blog/foundation-three-lawful-polygamy/#comment-2777 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:34:59 +0000 #comment-2777 I can understand the difficulty of receiving this teaching. I mentioned that my own daughter said it sounded "wacky," and admittedly it does.

Yet, we must agree with Yahweh's judgment, and He clearly allowed men to have more than one wife in the Law. He gave guidelines to govern the practice, and He even testified that He had given David his master's wives.

Consider also that Bathsheba was David's eighth wife, and Yahweh chose to bring from her womb the son who would rule in David's place. If God was committed to only one wife per husband, would he not have brought forth the next king from the union of David with his first wife?

These are things to ponder, and I am sure that Yahweh will bring forth much more revelation if we will approach Him and His word with an open mind, and not be offended by His ways.

]]>
By: Anonymous https://parables.blog/foundation-three-lawful-polygamy/#comment-2776 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:45:12 +0000 #comment-2776 I will be interested in reading what you have to say. I am not sure that I agree with God saying it is ok for men today to practice polygamy. My understanding that is if leaders are only to have one wife, that is because they are to set the example for the rest of us. I see God bringing us back to His original intention in the garden before the fall, which was one man and one woman for life. Jesus said, "For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife" It does not say wives. This is what I currently see. There is also a scripture in acts that says in times past God winked at these things, but now calls men everywhere to repent. I am glad you are touching on this topic though, it is not discussed much.

]]>
By: Kim https://parables.blog/foundation-three-lawful-polygamy/#comment-2775 Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:45:05 +0000 #comment-2775 I had often wondered about this, and while my human mind does not like it it; it certainly "gels" with what I have understood the word to be saying.

]]>