I thank you for the witness that articles on this Google blog site are being monitored and are not allowing people to forward them to others. I will be changing blog sites soon. I am also hearing that messages posted to Facebook and YouTube that are along the lines of the messages posted to this blog are not in keeping with the community standards of the sites. I will be looking at alternatives, but I am warning you that the Internet is no longer a faithful news provider.
Joseph Herrin (08-20-09)
Pictured Above: Pharmaceutical Parts Supplier
(Organs; eyes, kidneys, lungs harvested to produce biological material for vaccines.)
It is not hyperbole, sensationalism, or exaggeration to suggest that the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies are using body parts from babies to develop their vaccines. They are then injecting these vaccines that contain the infant’s DNA into millions of men, women and children, telling them that it will be of great benefit to them.
In part one of this series, found here:
it was shown that a number of suppliers of Swine Flu vaccine who are under contract to the World Health Organization and the United States government, are developing their vaccines using cell lines developed from aborted babies. In particular, the company Crucell and their cell line PER.C6 were examined. As I have looked further into this subject I have found that this is not a new practice, and to the horror of many, they may discover in this writing that they, or their children, have already received vaccines that were developed from the cells of aborted babies.
In part one of this series I stated that the actions of these companies is sinister and macabre. A standard English dictionary defines the word macabre as:
Macabre: gruesome and horrifying; ghastly; horrible; of, pertaining to, dealing with, or representing death, especially its grimmer or uglier aspect.
In the year 1729, Jonathan Swift wrote a satirical essay titled, A Modest Proposal. The subtitle read, “For Preventing the Children of Poor People in Ireland from Being a Burden to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to the Public.”
What Jonathan Swift proposed in this writing is that the impoverished Irish population might ease their suffering by selling their children to the nobility and the rich. What would the nobility and rich do with these children? They would eat them.
Swift’s writing has a shock value because it begins as a very serious piece, describing the impoverished conditions of the poor in Ireland. Then, out of the blue, he suggests his solution to this social dilemma. “A young healthy child well nursed, is, at a year old, a most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee, or a ragout.”
One deceit used by Swift to make his macabre proposal sound reasonable, is to describe the Irish infants using the language of animal husbandry. In doing so, he makes them appear less than human.
Once the children have been commoditized, Swift’s rhetoric can easily turn “people into animals, then meat, and from meat, logically, into tonnage worth a price per pound.”
What Jonathan Swift did in a work of fiction, America, her government, the medical community, and pharmaceutical corporations have done in reality. They have for years labored to describe a baby in the womb as less than human. John Holdren, an appointee of President Barack Obama, in a book titled Human Ecology, Problems and Solutions, made the following shocking statement:
“The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being.”
People of God, Jonathan Swift may well have used the same title for his satirical work as John Holdren, Human Ecology, Problems and Solutions. Shockingly, however, John Holdren’s work was not intended as satire. He was being absolutely serious. The book from which this quote was taken was published the same year that Roe v. Wade became the law of the land. Like the Supreme Court, Holdren used language to describe the unborn baby as less than human, calling it “the fetus.”
God declares the baby growing in the womb to be much more than a medical pseudonym for a piece of tissue.
For You did form my inward parts; You did weave me in my mother’s womb.
Thus says Yahweh who made you and formed you from the womb, who will help you…
Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you…
Yahweh, the God of all creation, declares that He knows the person from the very time in which they are being formed in the womb. Before we are fully formed, He declares that He knows us. Yet man, in his perversity, has described the child growing in the womb as less than human. Barack Obama’s TOP science advisor has written and published his own view that a baby will ultimately become a human being if it is given the chance to develop normally in the womb and is then provided years of proper socialization and nourishment.
I can tell you clearly where such reasoning leads, right back to the atrocities committed by Nazi Germany. Note that John Holdren does not say that a baby becomes a human being at a certain age. He says that it must be socialized properly to be categorized as a human being. This leads directly to the ultimate result that some men, women and children will be declared less than human if they do not pass the governmental test for proper socialization. If you or I believe, or behave in a manner, contrary to what the government declares to be proper social behavior, we will fall into the category of being sub-human. If you are not human, then it is not murder to kill you.
Do you think this logic sounds extreme? It is the same logic that has been used to justify the slaughter of over 50 million babies in America during the last 36 years. By declaring them less than human, the government has declared it to not be a criminal act to murder a baby while it is in its mother’s womb. For much of this time, they have even declared that it is not murder to kill a baby after it exits the womb, as long as the head has not been fully withdrawn. (Or in the case of a breech birth, the baby has not exited the womb further than its navel) This has led to the horrific practice of partial birth abortion, a form of abortion that Barack Obama supports.
Congress twice sought to ban this type of abortion, passing laws against it in 1995 and 1997, but President Clinton vetoed the legislation both times. In 2003 the Supreme Court upheld a ban on the procedure based on the argument that “A moral, medical, and ethical consensus exists that the practice of performing a partial-birth abortion… is a gruesome and inhumane procedure that is never medically necessary and should be prohibited.” However, there are loopholes in their ruling, and with new appointments to the Supreme Court it is only a matter of time before even this “gruesome and inhumane” procedure is once more permissible as the law of the land.
By referring to the baby with the scientific terminology, those favoring abortion have employed the same tactics used by Jonathan Swift in A Modest Proposal. They have given people reason to view a child in the womb as something other than a human being. Jonathan Swift suggested that Irish infants should be viewed as merely animals to be harvested for their meat. The government, scientific community, abortion proponents, and medical and pharmaceutical industry have described infants as merely biological tissue and have thereby dehumanized them.
We see now that Barack Obama has given top appointments to those who would go even further in suggesting that a child is not even human after it has been born. It must be properly nourished and socialized for years before being determined to be human. The abominations this type of reasoning will lead to will be seen in the near future.
It is this same perverse and macabre logic that has led to the government awarding contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars to pharmaceutical companies to develop vaccines that are derived from the organs and cells of aborted babies. In many cases the government has already demonstrated that they will not shrink from declaring such vaccines mandatory. They have been mandatory for years in order for children to attend the public school systems. The following excerpt is taken from the website of the national Right To Life organization.
Cell Lines Originating from Aborted Babies
There are two particular fetal cell lines that have been heavily used in vaccine development. They are named according to the laboratory facilities where they were developed. One cell line is known as WI-38, developed at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, PA. The other is MRC-5, developed for the Medical Research Council in England. WI-38 was developed by Dr. Leonard Hayflick in 1962, by taking lung cells from an aborted female baby at approximately the end of the third month of pregnancy.
Dr. Hayflick’s article published in the scientific journal, Experimental Cell Research states that three cell lines, WI-26, WI-38, WI-44 were all developed from aborted babies. “All embryos were obtained from surgical abortions and were of approximately three months’ gestation.” In another journal article (American Journal of Diseases of Childhood) from an international conference on Rubella, Dr. Stanley Plotkin who developed a Rubella vaccine using WI-38, addressed a question as to the origin of WI-38.
Dr. Plotkin stated, “This fetus was chosen by Dr. Sven Gard, specifically for this purpose. Both parents are known, and unfortunately for the story, they are married to each other, still alive and well, and living in Stockholm, presumably. The abortion was done because they felt they had too many children. There were no familial diseases in the history of either parent, and no history of cancer specifically in the families.”
The origin of the MCR-5 cell line, created in 1966, is documented in an article in the journal Nature by three British researchers working at the National Institute for Medical Research. J.P. Jacobs, et. al. write, “We have developed another strain of cells, also derived from foetal lung tissue, taken from a 14-week male foetus removed for psychiatric reasons from a 27 year old woman with a genetically normal family history and no sign of neoplastic disease both at abortion and for at least three years afterward…”
In both of these cell lines it is quite clear that the aborted children were presumed to be healthy, and that there was no life-threatening condition or other medically indicated reason for the abortion of these two babies…
The article goes on to provide a list of vaccines that have been in use for years that utilize these cell lines developed from aborted babies.
U.S. Produced Vaccines from Aborted Cell Lines
Disease Vaccine Name Manufacturer Cell Lines (fetal)
Polio Poliovax Aventis -Pasteur MRC-5
Rabies Imovax Aventis -Pasteur MRC-5
Hepatitis A Havrix Merck & Co. MRC-5
Hepatitis A Vaqta Glaxo/SmithKline MRC-5
Hepatitis A-B Twinrix Glaxo/SmithKline MRC-5
Smallpox Acambis Acambis MRC-5
Chickenpox Varivax Merck & Co. MRC-5/WI-38
Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) MMR II Merck & Co. WI-38
Mumps, Rubella Biavax Merck & Co. WI-38
Measles, Rubella MR-VAX Merck & Co. WI-38
Rubella Only Meruvax II Merck & Co. WI-38
The website goes on to mention that President George W. Bush ordered that America procure a supply of Smallpox vaccine in the event of a bioterrorist attack. No cases of Smallpox have been identified anywhere in the world since 1977. However, both the USA and Russia maintain live Smallpox virus which could be weaponized and used to begin the spread of the highly contagious, and often fatal disease. The Smallpox vaccine procured by the United States, in part was derived from aborted fetal cell lines.
It is a sick and sinister world that we live in. I can foresee the hour quickly approaching when some highly contagious plague is loosed upon mankind, and the proffered solution is to receive a mandatory vaccination that is derived from the cells of an aborted baby. Those who will object in the greatest measure will be Christians, and they will be vilified as radical religious extremists. Their refusal to take the mandatory vaccine will be viewed as detrimental to society. They will in many cases be rounded up and held in regional detention centers to effectively be quarantined.
The medical and scientific community has lost all sense of humanity. They have changed the language in which they describe human life to something devoid of personality. In doing so they have dehumanized mankind.
Science and the medical industry is on a course that views life in the womb as no more than a biological factory from which they might extract the material to meet their scientific and health goals. Progressively, human life from embryos to full-term babies are viewed as medical storehouses where cellular material can be harvested. Dr. Bernard Nathanson, creator of the pro-life films Silent Scream and Eclipse of Reason, stated the following:
“There are 1.4 million insulin dependent people in the United States and 30,000 new cases every year. To treat them, eight fetal pancreases are needed per person, harvested at 14 to 20 weeks and the prostaglandin abortion method must be used to preserve the pancreas. That equates to roughly 12 million fetuses at 14 to 20 weeks. With a total of 1.6 million abortions done annually in the US, where are all these babies, in that specific gestational age going to come from? Additionally there are four million people in the United States with Alzheimer’s Disease and 250,000 new cases every year. It takes five fetuses at 9-12 weeks to supply enough tissue to treat a central nervous system disease for one person, but there are also paraplegics, cerebral palsy sufferers and stroke victims. We would need 2.5 million fetuses at 9 to 12 weeks per year at least. Currently there are 800,000 babies a year killed in this 9 to 12 week window. Where are the other 1.7 million going to come from?”
Some are advocating that human cloning is the answer to provide the necessary biological material. By cloning, limbs and organs, bone marrow, blood cells and all manner of biological material might be created for the express purpose of being harvested to be implanted in people who can afford the procedures. Such a plan is perverse and an abomination in the eyes of God.
One of President Obama’s first acts as President involved expanding the research and development of embryonic stem cell lines. Such research again views human life as little more than a biological chemistry set.
Below is a picture of an infant at 18 weeks development.
Jonathan Swift was seeking to shock people into thinking when he described Irish infants as food to be eaten. The governments, medical and pharmaceutical industries, and science have lost all sense of shock and shame. They are able to suggest the most diabolical proposals without blushing, and without blinking an eye. They see the infant in the womb as nothing more than a biological storehouse, an accumulation of cells to be torn apart and harvested.
I am persuaded that God’s judgment stands at the door. The sorcerers and conjurers employed by big pharmaceutical companies may view a baby as a source of material for their poisons and potions, but God attends to the silent scream of every baby murdered in the womb. The blood of tens of millions cries out for judgment, and it will not delay.
Do not allow the madness and unblushing abominations of others to dull your own sensibility. Vaccines that are developed from the cells of aborted babies, that contain the DNA of the murdered child, are not blessed by God for the healing of the nations. Such devilishly derived concoctions are an atrocity in His sight.
Babies are not given by God to become lab experiments. Killing them and then using their bodies as a pharmaceutical parts warehouse is not merely unethical, it is abominable. The medical profession kills the babies, and Big Pharma has acquired the bodies to make their vaccines. Will not all be complicit who knowingly receive such vaccines in order to promote their own welfare?
The infant and the unborn are the weakest members of society. They have no words to utter a defense. They have no strength to flee. It is up to those who do have strength and words to defend them.
Open your mouth for the dumb, for the rights of all the unfortunate. Open your mouth, judge righteously, and defend the rights of the afflicted and needy.
As I Was Writing
As I was writing this article an event took place in the upper Midwest of the U.S.A. that I believe relates to the message the Father is bringing forth. What appeared to be a relatively benign storm suddenly became severe, but it is the specific damage that it caused that arrests the attention.
The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America convention was being held at the Minneapolis Convention Center. The Central Lutheran Church is located nearby and was serving as a preparation area to provide meals to convention attendees. Suddenly the sky turned dark and a fierce wind arose and scattered the tables and chairs outside the church.
I am reminded of Christ, when He entered the Temple in Jerusalem and overturned the tables of the merchants and money changers. The Lutheran Church is the same church that George Tiller, America’s largest abortion provider, was a member of until a gunman recently entered the Lutheran Church in Kansas City and shot him. Not only was George Tiller a member, but he was a deacon in the church.
This storm also damaged an independent music store in Minneapolis that bore the very unusual name the Electric Fetus. The windows were blown out and the roof collapsed while stores on either side of it remained undamaged.
I am persuaded that the Lord is declaring in this event that there are two core issues for which He is bringing swift judgment to the Lutheran Church. One is for her tolerance, and even support of, abortion. The other is for her present actions to sanction homosexuality within the church. The following item revealing the agenda of this Lutheran convention was found on the Catholic News Agency site.
Minneapolis, Minn., Aug 18, 2009 / 11:38 pm (CNA).-
The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) is considering a proposal that would allow members in homosexual relationships to serve as clergy. It has denied a motion to require a higher proportion of votes for the proposal to pass.
The Lutheran Church has already allowed the nation’s largest abortion provider to serve as clergy, now they are voting on whether to allow homosexuals to do the same. It is suspected that a tornado was spawned from the thunderstorm moving through Minneapolis. It struck the church at approximately 2:00 P.M., the very time the convention was scheduled to begin consideration of the proposed Social Statement on Human Sexuality. This statement included comments advocating the acceptance of homosexuality as a normal lifestyle.
Not only did the storm overturn the tables outside Central Lutheran Church, it also damaged the church’s steeple, leaving the cross atop it dangling upside down. The inverted cross is a symbol used by the Satanic Church.
The convention passed the Social Statement on Human Sexuality, but before it was passed various amendments were recommended, including one that sought to replace a section of the social statement about “lifelong monogamous same-gender relationships” with one that asserts the “practice of homosexual erotic behavior as contrary to God’s intent.”
In a 667-303 vote, the assembly opted against the aforementioned change, following the recommendation of an ad hoc committee that advised against the amendment’s adoption since the position articulated implies “a consensus that no longer exists.”
There is not even a consensus among this apostate religious organization that the practice of homosexual erotic behavior is contrary to God’s intent.
A further symbolic note is that this same storm system struck a town called Loami. This is a name used prophetically in the Scriptures, and the understanding is very clear.
And Yahweh said, “Name him Lo-ammi, for you are not My people and I am not your God.”
People of God, these are very serious matters. Judgment must begin at the house of God. He is even now making a division among those who are His righteous servants and those who are not. We will soon see the following Scripture fulfilled.
And Yahweh said to him, “Go through the midst of the city, even through the midst of Jerusalem, and put a mark on the foreheads of the men who sigh and groan over all the abominations which are being committed in its midst.” But to the others He said in my hearing, “Go through the city after him and strike; do not let your eye have pity, and do not spare. Utterly slay old men, young men, maidens, little children, and women, but do not touch any man on whom is the mark; and you shall start from My sanctuary.”
Yes, God is declaring that homosexuality, abortion, and the macabre cannibalism of human fetuses, are abominations in His sight. Let those who fear God and love righteousness separate themselves from that which is bringing forth the judgment of Yahweh.