Lunar Lander Model in a Mississippi Park
This will be the last chapter of this book to address technological problems of the NASA Apollo Space Program narrative. There are a great many technology issues which could be addressed, but it has never been a goal of this book to serve as an exhaustive treatise on all of the evidence related to this topic. I am going to briefly touch on a number of technologies reportedly used in the Apollo program. If the reader is inclined to do so, they are encouraged to search out these subjects further on their own.
One of the claims of NASA that strikes me as lacking credibility (and there are many), is that the astronauts of the Apollo program were able to set the lunar lander down on the Moon’s surface on six different occasions without mishap. This claim is particularly improbable because the technology had never been tested prior to landing on the Moon, and nothing else like it existed anywhere.
NASA created a simulator for the astronauts to practice on to give them some Earth-based experience on handling the lunar lander.
Lunar Lander Research Vehicle (LLRV)
The LLRV, however, seemed to be more of a proof-of-concept design to convince the public that NASA had this technology well in hand, than an actual simulator of what the Apollo astronauts would experience. The LLRV had guidance rockets mounted in strategic places on the frame to control the motion of the craft. These guidance rockets were not powerful enough to lift the LLRV off the surface of the Earth, so NASA chose to mount a jet engine in the bottom center of the craft, mounted on gimbals which allowed it to move. The jet engine provided thrust to raise the vehicle off the ground. Jet engines, however, cannot be used on the Moon for they operate by pushing massive amounts of air at high speed through their turbines. The Moon has no atmosphere, so jets cannot be used there.
The public may have been fooled into thinking that there is no essential difference between mounting a jet underneath a vehicle and mounting a rocket in the same place, but the differences are in fact many and significant. One of the critical differences is that a jet engine can be throttled up and down easily to alter the amount of thrust it is producing. By contrast, at the time of the Apollo program, no rocket had ever been designed that could be throttled up and down to vary its thrust. Rockets were either on or off. They were pedal to the metal, or full stop. Yet, to land a craft on the Moon would require a variable thrust rocket motor so that the thrust could be tapered off as the vehicle approached the lunar surface.
One anomalous detail of the Moon landings that has been pointed out by many individuals is that both the landing rocket and the launch rocket used to escape from the lunar surface are shown in television clips and still images as having no visible rocket plume.
This is to me one of the most poorly faked parts of the Apollo missions. The omission of the rocket plume and exhaust smoke seems to have been accepted by many people as authentic because they had been previously plied with images of the LLRV flying in the Earth’s atmosphere without any exhaust trail. Most of the public never understood that the LLRV used a jet engine, not a rocket.
LLRV Training Flight
NASA never built a prototype of the Lunar Lander using variable thrust rockets which the astronauts could test on Earth. Consequently, the very first time the Apollo astronauts ever flew such a craft was when they reportedly landed them on the Moon. These Moon vehicles would have been more problematic than the LLRV which was used for Earth simulations, yet the astronauts had great difficulty just flying the LLRV. The following video shows Neil Armstrong in a test session with the LLRV when it becomes unstable. Not being able to correct the stability of the craft, he is forced to use the emergency ejection seat and parachute to the ground. The LLRV then crashes and bursts into flames. That would be a rather tragic ending for any of the Apollo Moon landings.
Nevertheless, we are to believe that the Apollo astronauts, having to steer their craft by peering out a window, making visibility much more problematic than sitting in an open trainer, were able to land their spacecraft without any problems six times in a row.
The truth is that man has only recently come close to perfecting tail first rocket landings. The private firms Blue Origins and SpaceX have both been working on perfecting rocket landings so that they can re-use their rockets and thereby cut down significantly on costs. These two companies, employing the best minds in rocket science today, having nearly 50 more years of advances in rocket technology behind them, and being able to use extremely powerful computers to perform critical real-time adjustments to the rocket’s guidance systems, experienced crash after crash until only in the last year being able to accomplish a tail first landing.
SpaceX vs Blue Origin
Numerous videos of the rockets crashing while attempting tail first landings can be viewed online.
The following video shows a successful tail first landing of a Blue Origin rocket. Note all the dust and debris kicked up by the rocket, and the fiery glow as the rocket settles onto the ground.
The Apollo Lunar Lander by contrast shows very little dust being kicked up, and where there should be melted silica and a crater scoured out by the blast of the rocket engine, the ground appears perfectly undisturbed in Apollo images.
Additionally, the foil like covering which wrapped the exterior of the Lunar Lander should have been ripped to shreds by the blast of the lunar soil being violently hurled out by the force of the landing rockets. Yet, the thin foil-like covering is pristine and undamaged in Apollo photographs.
If man is only now perfecting the ability to land rockets tail first using variable thrust rocket engines, and they are achieving this by using lightning quick computers and sophisticated programming, how did men in the 1960s accomplish the same feat without the aid of embedded computer control systems?
Another bit of mythological Apollo technology is their extreme environment air conditioning systems. I live in a motorhome, and I have installed an auxiliary solar power system. I have three large Absorbed Glass Mat batteries, some of the best technology available to consumers today for this type of application. Each of the batteries weighs 90 pounds. Together they provide 459 Amp Hours of electric power. This is sufficient to power a number of things, including LED lights which are a technology that did not exist in the 1960s. The Apollo Command Module used fluorescent lamps for its general illumination, and the Lunar Module used incandescent lamps.
[Souce: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/tnD7290Lighting.pdf]
Both fluorescent and incandescent lighting use far more electricity than LEDs. My battery system is sufficient to run numerous LED lights, some small appliances such as a laptop computer, printer, a fan, and a very efficient 12 volt DC freezer. I do have a power converter to supply 110 volt AC power from my battery bank, and with this I can operate a microwave and other small appliances for brief periods. Yet, one thing I cannot run from my battery bank is my motorhome’s air conditioner. Air conditioners are extremely power hungry devices, and although I can power the roof air conditioner from my batteries, it would drain them in just a couple hours.
Understand that the air conditioner I use needs to only handle the much milder conditions of Earth. The highest temperatures I experience at my location rarely reach 100 degrees Fahrenheit, or 37 degrees Celsius. On the Moon, however, temperatures vary from 250 degrees Fahrenheit in the Sun, to minus 250 degrees in the shade. The Apollo Command Module and Lunar Module both had to be equipped with their own battery banks, and these battery banks had to be large enough to power a heating and cooling system far more capable than anything needed on Earth.
NASA states that the Apollo missions relied upon batteries and fuel cells to supply all of the power needs of their various modules, as well as for the Lunar Rovers used on later missions. I am admittedly a profound skeptic regarding these claims. The Apollo Mission requirements would have necessitated that the entire Lunar Module, not just the small astronaut living quarters, be environmentally controlled. The rocket fuels used would boil away if subjected to the intense heat of the lunar surface, therefore the fuel tanks had to be maintained at a consistent temperature.
Additionally the spacesuits used by the astronauts had to cool and heat them in an environment of the same temperature extremes. The spacesuits needed power for numerous things, including their oxygen delivery system, and the water circulation pumps used to cool the astronauts. All this had to be powered by battery. One characteristic of batteries of all types is that they are sensitive to temperature variations, for they depend upon chemical reactions in order to work. If a battery gets too hot or too cold it can be greatly degraded in its ability to supply power, or worse, it could explode or catch fire.
Battery technology in the 1960s was not what it is today. I do not believe NASA had the technology to send men out into space for 8-12 days at a time, running all of their power intensive systems off of batteries and fuel cells. The weight of the batteries required to run these systems for the extensive times involved would have been prohibitive.
Related to the subject of spacesuits, some surprising comments were made by Michael Wargo, NASA’s chief lunar scientist for Exploration Systems in a November 2009 article posted to the Space.com website. While commenting on establishing a lunar base, Wargo stated the following.
“None of our spacesuits that we currently have would be appropriate for that extreme an environment.” Any materials built for Earth-like temperatures won’t work on the moon. “They don’t bend anymore, they fracture, and they fracture brittle-y, and so everything gets extremely brittle at those temperatures,” Wargo said.
[Source: http://www.space.com/7532-water-discovery-fuels-hope-colonize-moon.html]
So what material did the Apollo astronauts use? They appeared to be quite flexible and mobile, and their suits did not appear to be brittle or to fracture.
Then there is the issue of the slow motion movements of the astronauts while on the lunar surface. Stanley Kubrick had popularized the idea of people in space or in low gravity environments moving in slow motion in his film 2001, A Space Odyssey. This movie was released the year before the first Apollo Moon landing. Its depiction of movement in space helped prepare people to accept the videos of the Apollo Moon walks.
It does not make sense for the astronauts on the Moon to move about in slow motion. In 1/6th gravity their actions should be quicker, and without an atmosphere to dampen movements, motions should occur faster for friction is reduced. The only thing that would be slowed would be vertical motions as the diminished lunar gravity pulls objects toward the surface. Just ask yourself the question, “Should a person be able to run faster in a low gravity environment with no atmosphere, or in a high gravity environment with a thick atmosphere?”
To think of it another way, consider how your movements would be affected if you put 10 pound weights on each of your feet. Would you not move slower with the added weight? How about if you increased the weight to 25 pounds on each foot, and then 50 pounds on each foot? You would be sluggish indeed. Now consider that you have been walking around with a 50 pound weight on each foot for a month, and suddenly you take the weights off. What would your muscle memory do to your actions? You would end up making quicker, exaggerated motions unintentionally. Yet that is not what we see in the movements of the astronauts on the Moon.
The truth is that no man has ever observed a person moving on the surface of a planet with a lower gravity than Earth’s and a thinner atmosphere, so people are easily persuaded to believe whatever depictions are shown to them on television.
I am going to move on now to discuss another subject that often comes up when discussing the Moon landing hoax. Many people defend the NASA narrative by stating that, if it were not true, the Soviets would certainly have known the truth and announced the deception to the world, for they were the mortal enemies of the United States. People who make such assertions have not yet discerned how deep the rabbit hole of deception goes.
Kruschev and Kennedy, 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis
The Cold War that existed between the United States and the Soviet Union was itself a fiction concocted to deceive the citizens of the nations and justify immense military and government spending programs. NASA itself would not have come into existence unless the Soviets were seen as the enemies of America and it appeared that they were winning the space race. By beating the drums of war and engaging in fearmongering of the Soviets being able to put satellites in orbit anywhere and drop nuclear bombs on Americans from the skies, forces within the American government were able to wrest billions of additional dollars annually from the American citizens and place the money into the hands of the global corporate elite.
Who are the parties which profited during the Cold War? That is the question to ask if you want to know who originated the deception. The chief profiteers were the bankers and industrialists who supplied the financing and the material to conduct the Cold War. What the Cold War accomplished was the rape of two of the most wealthy nations on Earth, both with immense natural resources. Rather than the citizens reaping the benefits of their nation’s resources, a conflict was manufactured to transfer the wealth to the hands of a few global elite.
In the book Dragon Flood I recounted how American bankers and corporations built the fledgling Soviet Union into a global power so that it could be used to create the fiction of a multi-polar world with two super-powers who were at odds with one another. Following is an excerpt.
—
Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin
America’s government has maintained an image of being opposed to Communism, but her policies, and the actions of her bankers and industrialists, have been quite the opposite. At a time when Russia was still vulnerable to overthrow from members of her own country, American policy betrayed those who opposed the Communist government, sending millions to their deaths. Many Russians who were anti-Communist, put their trust in the American government who outwardly evinced a policy to stop Communism. The misplaced trust in America’s political leaders proved to be a fatal mistake for many. Ralph Epperson writes of the period following World War II.
Roosevelt and Eisenhower approved the forced repatriation of some six million people back to Russia, many of whom were tortured or killed after they reached their destination.
Two Russians who have written of this abominable decision of these American leaders are Nikolai Tolstoy and Alexandr Solzhenitsyn. The Americans called this repatriation “Operation Keelhaul,” after the naval form of punishment or torture where the prisoner is hauled under the keel of a ship by a rope tied to the prisoner’s body.
These six million individuals were not only soldiers who had fought on the side of the Germans against the Russians, but they were women and children as well.
700,000 of this total were soldiers under the command of Lt. Gen. Andrei Vlasov, a brilliant Soviet officer and one of the heroes of the battle of Moscow in 1942. In April of 1945, General Vlasov led his troops to the American lines so that they could surrender and then volunteer to return to Communist Russia and attempt to oust the Bolshevik government. They laid down their arms and considered themselves to be American Prisoners of War.
Vlasov was informed that permission to pass through the American lines had been refused, so he had to order his unarmed men to save themselves as best they could. Most of them were forcibly repatriated back to Russia and executed. General Vlasov himself was taken from an American escort by Soviet troops and spirited away to Moscow where he was later executed.
The British government behaved no more honorably. Despite guarantees to the contrary, more than 30,000 Cossacks, including women and children, led by General P.N. Krasnov, were disarmed and forcibly turned over to the Russian Army. Many committed suicide rather than be repatriated back to the Communist government in Russia.
[Source: The Unseen Hand, Ralph A. Epperson]
In another section of his book, Epperson relates the immense support that America gave the Soviets in building up their industrial capacity, their military, and in keeping them afloat financially. The ultimate goal of the global elite guiding this policy was the formation of a single world government. Joseph Stalin spoke of the reasons that the Communist nations needed the support of Capitalist nations. He said:
It is essential that the proletariat of the advanced countries should render real and prolonged aid to the backward nationalities in their cultural and economic development. Unless such aid is forthcoming, it will be impossible to bring the various nations and peoples within a single world economic system that is so essential for the triumph of socialism.
[Source: Dan Smoot Report, June 22, 1959]
Ralph Epperson shares the following information.
It was America’s early plan to conceal the true intent of their sale of technology to Russia: to build a superior Russian military power. To accomplish this subterfuge, it became their task to convince the skeptical that the technology was being sold to Russia to assist them in reconstructing their war-ravaged economy, and that such aid was civilian and not military.
For instance, some of the first factories constructed in Russia in the 1920’s and 1930’s were “tractor” factories, constructed in the Russian cities of Volgograd, Kharkov, and Chelyabinsk. All three were constructed by American companies…
These “tractor” factories, ostensibly constructed to supply farm tractors to the Russian farmer, today produce tanks, armored cars, self-propelled guns, launchers, missile carriers, anti-aircraft guns, and trucks.
In addition, military tanks, so essential to any military structure, are constructed in two key production plants: “the Gorki plant and the Zil plant…” The Gorki plant was built from scratch by Henry Ford in the 1930’s…
One of the most recent examples of American technology coming back to haunt the American people has come from the experience in building the Kama River truck factory in Russia in 1969. This plant, capable of producing 100,000 heavy duty trucks and 150,000 diesel engines a year, more than all U.S. manufacturers put together, cost the Russians over $1.4 billion. Nearly $1 billion of that total came from the United States in the form of computers, heavy equipment, and foundry equipment…
In addition to building the plants that produce the military hardware essential to Russia’s armed forces, the Americans constructed essential industries to assist the actual construction process. For instance, there are two steel plants in Russia… Both of these plants were constructed by American companies, the one in Magnitogorsk by the Arthur G. McKee & Co., the builder of the U.S. Steel plant in Gary, Indiana, and the other by the Freyn Engineering Company of Chicago.
The oil industry also received American attention… Lenin gave three oil boring concessions to three major oil companies: Standard Oil Company (Rockefeller); the Comparre Oil Company of New Jersey…, and Royal Dutch Shell.
In addition to the oil concessions, Standard Oil received a concession to build a 150,000 ton kerosene plant, capable of producing 100 octane gasoline. Standard Oil also concluded a deal to market Russian oil in Eastern European markets…
Gary Allen, another researcher of merit into this subject has stated: “It is possible the Rockefellers still own oil production facilities behind the Iron Curtain, drawing profits out through Switzerland.
[Source: The Unseen Hand, Ralph A. Epperson]
What is even more shocking is that the American government sent the Soviets plans for America’s military technology, including the building of submarines and the atomic bomb. The transfer to Russia of the technology to build nuclear weapons was alluded to in a novel written by the son of Franklin Roosevelt in 1980. The book is titled A Family Matter. The dust cover of the book states, “Roosevelt… makes a bold secret decision – to share the results of the Manhattan Project with the Soviet Union.”
The world banking interests would have had a hard time selling to America and the West the idea of a Soviet threat if America alone had nuclear weapons and Russia did not. There would have been little basis for an arms race, thus the technology was given to the Russians. It was necessary for the Russians to have nuclear weapons so that a state of continual threat of nuclear destruction could be used to justify both exorbitant military spending and various policy actions.
An article in the Wall Street Journal of April 25, 1975, headlined: “U.S. Quietly Allows Uranium Shipments to Soviet Union for Processing into Fuel.” The article detailed that the State Department had approved the sale of 1.4 million pounds of uranium oxide mined in Wyoming and New Mexico to the Soviet government. It would in turn be processed into pellets rich in Uranium 235. “This isotope provides the power for nuclear electric plants and for the atomic bomb.”
[Source: Ibid]
Why, one might ask, if the American government truly considered the Soviet Union to be an “Evil Empire” would it be sending it highly controlled material used in the construction of weapons of mass destruction?
There have been some men in high positions within the U.S. government and military who have discovered what has been done clandestinely to build up the Soviet Union, all the while the same government and military are saying that the Soviet Union was the greatest threat to global freedom and peace. Two men in particular were James Forrestal, America’s first Secretary of Defense, and General George Patton. These men were adamantly opposed to aiding the Soviets, and discovering that the policies and actions of the American government were aiding the Communists, these men became outspoken critics. Both men met untimely deaths while in the care of the government in military hospitals. For those who care to pursue this subject further, their stories make insightful reading. Interestingly, both James Forrestal and Joseph McCarthy, died in Bethesda Naval Hospital under suspicious circumstances.
People of God, as the media and government have for decades talked about the “Red Menace” of the Soviet Union, they have used this as an excuse for massive military spending and entry into numerous conflicts.
[End Excerpt]
Brothers and sisters, the Cold War, like the Space Race which grew out of it, were both fictions created for public consumption. They were used to justify the huge expenditures of governments which in turn passed the money along to multinational corporations and bankers. Remember once again the words of President Kennedy cited early on in this book.
The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings…
Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.
If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent…
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence – on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.
John F. Kennedy became aware of this hidden monolithic power, and he opposed it. He should have been aware of the danger of doing so, for he stated “Its dissenters are silenced, not praised.” Yet, to an extent, Kennedy was also a pawn in the hands of this powerful threat. It was Kennedy who presented the vision for America to place men on the Moon, a scheme that originated in the minds of the same men he condemned.
Why did the Soviets not expose the deceit of the United States Apollo Missions? The Soviets were not truly America’s enemies. The Cold War was all political theater, and it turned out to be a highly profitable show for the international bankers and corporate rulers. There was as much deception in the Soviet space program as there was in the American, yet America did not expose the Soviet fraud. Instead America’s government and media played it up, giving top billing and front page headlines to each new Soviet accomplishment. In this way they were able to frighten the American people, convincing them that after having won World War II they now would be eclipsed by “the Red Menace,” that godless, atheistic empire which threatened to make all men into impoverished slaves.
Oh the great cunning of it all! Satan has given the script to his earthly disciples and they have played all humanity for fools. Some weeks ago in my research I came across a 1966 publication titled Russia’s Space Hoax. It was a special news book written by Lloyd Mallan and published by Science and Mechanics. I was able to acquire a copy online. On the Contents page were listed the following stories.
Why Red Missiles Can Not Destroy Our Cities
(Proof that the Russian missile threat is actually a ‘paper tiger.’)
How the Russian “Space Walk” was Faked – Parts 1, 2, and 3
(Proving Leonov’s “walk in space” was actually a phony!)
The Russian Spacemen Who Weren’t There – Parts 1, 2, and 3
(Evidence that the Reds have never orbited a manned spacecraft.)
The publication also includes a story titled Russia’s Scientific Piracy. What the author did not perceive, or did not disclose, is that it was not covert piracy which led to the Russians obtaining so much of the technology of the West. The technology was transferred outright by the global corporations who serve only their own interests. They have no patriotism toward any nation or land or people.
In the article How the Russian “Space Walk” was Faked, Mallan provides numerous evidence and arguments similar to those set forth by individuals who have exposed the fakery of the American space program. The same tactics were used by both nations. In one photo which was famous at the time, showing Soviet Cosmonaut Alexey Leonov performing the first space walk, it was concluded by numerous experts that the photo was actually shot underwater, a common environment for simulating the weightlessness of space.
Alexey Leonov Beginning First Space Walk
An interesting story is told elsewhere of the deception of Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin’s accomplishments. In the documentary video What Happened on the Moon – Hoax, Lies, and Videotape, David Percy and Mary Bennett provide evidence of the fakery involved in the Soviet space program.
https://youtu.be/3KBYiWfHcLA
Being apprised of these things, we might as well ask why the American government and mainstream media did not expose the deceptions of the Soviets. The answer should be apparent now to the reader of this book. The governments of nations and global media are alike controlled by the international corporate masters. Both the American and Soviet governments were playing assigned roles which benefitted the bankers and global corporations while extracting billions of dollars annually from the citizens of both nations. The Space Race, like the Cold War, was a swindle on a global scale. Satan is the great deceiver who deceives the whole world.
Heart4God Website: http://www.heart4god.ws
Parables Blog: www.parablesblog.blogspot.com
Mailing Address:
Joseph Herrin
P.O. Box 804
Montezuma, GA 31063
Dear Brother Joseph,
If I may mention to your readers in regards to the subject of U.S. and Bolshevik/Soviet collusion, I would strongly recommend reading Diana West's book, "American Betrayal". It's a well researched book with copious footnotes. The only thing I would caution against, is that her premise is that Islam is infiltrating our government the way the Communists did. However, that argument takes up only about the first chapter. The information in the rest of the book is astounding. My local library had it if you don't want to buy it. I will confess that it was difficult to read. Many times I had to put the book down to cry from the shock and the heartbreak of what our government was doing during FDR's time and afterwards.
Also, in regards to James Forrestal, I would highly recommend reading the six part series by David Martin regarding Mr. Forrestal's "suicide".
http://www.dcdave.com/article4/021110.html
Truly, Satan is the great deceiver who deceives the whole world.
Thanks Joe for you hard work. I had never thought much about the moon hoax until you began your series. Now its hard to miss. It shatters myths my of America from the 60's and 70's. Wow, who can imagine such degrees of wickedness.
Thanks again.
Darrell
Dear brother Joseph, it was not that long ago that I was watching a informational video with my father – a Vietnam War veteran – who served as a medical corp man. The presenter was also a Vietnam War veteran and he stated that he served in Army Intelligence. One of his responsibilities as an intelligence officer was to read the major daily news papers. He went on to testify that what he read in the papers and what he KNEW was really going on in Vietnam were as different as night and day. He further stated that whatever the media was telling you today – if you believed the exact opposite to be true – then you would probably be closer to the truth than what you were being told.
As to your comments about end-time deception. Most of the people in the western world have been influenced directly or indirectly by the black magic doctrine, dogma and deceit of the Society of Jesus – which is also known as the Jesuit Order. This black magic cult of sorcery was founded for one purpose only and that was / is to destroy all those who would believe in salvation by favour through faith – as a freely given gift by Yahweh Elohim – through His only begotten – Yahoshua haMashiach.
If anyone would take the time to carefully study The Council of Trent – then they would soon realize that the Jesuit order has succeeded beyond their wildest dreams at indoctrinating the world to believe in every abominable lie imaginable. The Illuminati and the Free Masons are but mere puppets doing the bidding of this army of the Devil. They are in fact the protestant arm of the Jesuits – even as the KKK is the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party.
If anyone would study Daniel 7 and Revelation 13 using the figurative = literal approach and simply follow the Israel Centric chronology of history from that time to the present – they would come to the same conclusion that almost all of the so called Protestant father's came to prior to the twentieth century. Almost all of the prophecies that have been reassigned to the unknowable future have already been fulfilled before the twentieth century even began.
Finally, as to a possible alien invasion… as those depicted in the first avengers movie and others that you have already mentioned. I personally believe that the world is being prepared to fight Yahoshua and His army when we come to reign and rule the earth – as described in Revelation 19 & 20 – as well as Ezekiel 38 & 39. We are the ones that the world hates and will try to destroy when we follow our King as He comes to Judge the earth in righteousness.
I have long know that the moon landing was / is a hoax and that many of NASA's flaunted achievements are a lie. However, I am very thankful to have this resource to be able to share with others, as it was very well written and the cloud of witnesses you have amassed is undeniable to the honest critic. Thank you once again for your ministry and faithfulness.
Sincerely and in Love, your servant and His, Robert Arthur McDuffie – Gal.14
Ps – I just finished the book "The Temples Jerusalem Forgot" by Ernest L. Martin. http://www.askelm.com If you have not availed yourself to this resource, I highly recommend it. The late Dr Martin managed to accumulate a cloud of witnesses that undeniably prove that the actual temple sight(s) was approximately six hundred feet to the south of the kotel (the so called western wall of the temple).
Not only did our Messiah prophecy that every stone of the temple would be over thrown and cast down, He also foretold that every stone in Jerusalem would also be overturned (Luke 19:41-44). We all have to make a choice. Either believe the traditions of the scholars of Judaism, Christendom and Islam – concerning the history of the temple and the city of Jerusalem or believe the words of our Messiah – Yahoshua haMashiach.
If Yahoshua is to be believed then it is impossible that one stone of the "Via Dolorosa" could have possibly existed at the time that our Messiah walked the earth.
Finally, I was astounded to "discover" that Herod's temple was actually the fourth fully constructed temple from its very foundation and not the second as I was repeatedly told my entire life. Once again, the documented evidence presented by Dr. Martin is absolutely overwhelming.
Hitler's minister of propaganda was 100% correct… "The Bigger The Lie, The More People Will Believe It!"
Yahweh once told His servant Jeremiah that His own people loved to listen to lies and to hear those that told them – more than they love the truth. That pretty much sums up the real reason we as Spirit-filled, born-again believers are deceived about a great many things – at least until the One True Sovereign takes His rightful throne in Jerusalem.
Hello Robert,
Thank you for taking the time to comment. I do recognize the evil goals of the Jesuit Order. I do caution against going too far in making claims of their influence, however. To suggest that the Illuminati and Freemasons are merely branches of the Jesuits, fully guided and controlled by them is a claim I have doubts regarding. I think it is sufficient to recognize that they are all Satanic organizations playing their assigned roles in advancing his kingdom and deceptions in this world.
Similarly, your statement that the KKK is the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party is a claim I cannot add my Amen to. I am aware of the origins of the KKK, and its associations with Democrats following the Civil War. I believe it is necessary, however, to be as precise as possible in our statements, for Christ is "Truth" and His disciples should strive to speak truth without any admixture of error.
The KKK was not the creation of the Democratic Party, though it was started by men who were Democrats. That is a notable distinction. Consequently, it does not follow that the KKK is the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party. I believe the statements and conclusions found at the following website article are fair and accurate.
KKK and Democrats
In your comment you also stated,
"If anyone would study Daniel 7 and Revelation 13 using the figurative = literal approach and simply follow the Israel Centric chronology of history from that time to the present – they would come to the same conclusion that almost all of the so called Protestant father's came to prior to the twentieth century. Almost all of the prophecies that have been reassigned to the unknowable future have already been fulfilled before the twentieth century even began."
You appear to be endorsing what is referred to as the Preterist viewpoint. I am once again unable to add my "Amen" to the doctrine of Preterism. Your comment in this regard is off-topic, and cannot be adequately addressed in a comment field.
Please know that I do not share these responses to your comments with any rancor. What I would encourage you to do is to consider every statement you make in a public comment field with the same carefulness one should have in preaching or writing a book. It is necessary to strive toward the goal of saying only those things which are birthed and approved by the Spirit of Christ. This does require much self-restraint as we seek to divide between soul and Spirit and declare only those things the Spirit of Christ commands us to speak.
Regarding your second comment on Ernest L. Martin's book, I have read what he has to say about the present Western Wall in Jerusalem NOT being an actual part of Herod's Temple, but in fact being part of a Roman fortification. He does make a very convincing argument on that topic. I think particularly his emphasis on Christ saying not one stone will be left upon another of the Temple, and referring to historical accounts of the devastation of the Temple and Jerusalem by the Romans, argues very well for a conclusion that the Wailing Wall is not in fact part of the Temple complex.
May you be blessed with peace and understanding in these days.
Dear brother Joseph, have you ever looked up how many colleges and universities have been founded by the Jesuits – not just in the US – but also throughout the world? Once you start to look up the pedigree of the world’s elite you begin to realize that the majority of those who are in power today – in government, military, finance, entertainment and media (aka the elite) have all been indoctrinated by the Jesuits. Now I am not saying that all those who graduate are Jesuits – not even close. However, what I am simply saying is that they (we) have all been brain-washed/programmed with a Jesuit world view.
Yahoshua spoke these words to the assembly at Ephesus, "Yet this you have: you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate." I am sure that you probably already know that "Nico" means to rule and "laitans" is the people – from which we derive the word laity. Yahoshua was simply saying that he hated man-made religious organizations that wielded undue authority over the masses. He also said they we too should hate such organizational structures.
The sad reality is that once you have successfully infiltrated an organizations ruling hierarchy – it is not that hard to challenge, change and even control the dogma and doctrine of the entire organization. I.e. Propaganda! In 2010, I read a book that was given to me by a Protestant minister of a major Christian denomination. After I finished reading it, I informed my wife that it was written by a Jesuit priest and that the information communicated was pure Jesuit doctrine.
The next day, we traveled from Florida to California. While visiting friends, we were invited to partake in a weekly home Bible study fellowship. After the study, one of the woman stated matter-of-factly that the whole of their denomination (by matter of coincidence it was the same denomination of the pastor who gave me the book the previous week) had been hi-jacked by the Jesuits at the highest levels and that all of their pastors and leaders were in fact being indoctrinated by Jesuit teachings and that most of their pastors were presently preaching and teaching Jesuit doctrines and dogma to their assemblies.
Immediately, I asked her if she had ever heard of the book I had been given to read and she instantly identified the author as one of the very Jesuits she had been speaking of. I later discovered that this woman was the widow of one of the directors of this denominations North American Conference. In other words – she was speaking as an insider – who knew what she was talking about.
If anyone would take the time to examine the various eschatological positions held by evangelical Christianity today, one would be amazed to discover that none of these views were held in any regard by born again believers at the turn of the twentieth century. Although on the surface they all seem to be greatly diverse – at their heart they all have a commonality that was first introduced by the Jesuits at the Council of Trent. How could this be?
What I was referring to previously was not preterism brother Joseph, it is actually properly called historicism. I too first thought it preposterous that most of Daniel and Revelation have been fulfilled over the last 2,000 years – that is until I came across the recommended reading list of Charles Spurgeon. He recommended Honorae Apocolyptae as an excellent treatise on understanding the figurative = literal prophetic legend throughout the chronological narrative of the last twenty-five hundred years.
Trust me… I know what Preterism is and I know what dispensational futurism is and I KNOW that both are the inventions of the Jesuits to destroy all those who hold to the one true faith – once and for all. As far as I know, none of the acknowledged Protestant fathers (Luther, Calvin, Knox, Wesley(s), etc. were either preterist or futurist in their eschatological views. I hope that you can look into this matter further and write about it on your blog someday.
Sincerely,
Robert McDuffie
Hello Brother Robert,
Thank you for your patience in sharing further. I am familiar with the origins and purposes of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits) and their role in the "counter-Reformation." I also have some familiarity with their influence among world leaders in politics, commerce, and religion. Georgetown University is one of a number of Jesuit University's in our own nation which exerts an inordinate influence upon the United States and abroad.
In sharing my concerns and cautions with you regarding your previous comments, I was in no way suggesting that the Jesuits do not wield an immense influence in this world. They have even been able to recently seat one of their own as Pope of the Roman Catholic Church, something that has previously not been done openly.
My caution is in assigning too much credit to a single organization and trying to declare a hierarchy of sorts where the Jesuits are at the top of the pecking order. When you wrote that the Illuminati and Freemasons are no more than puppets of the Jesuits, and the KKK is the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party, it is my judgment that both statements are overly broad and unproven.
I have read other claims that the Jesuits were a creation of a group of occult Kabbalistic Jews. Following is a quote from John S. Torell.
"In 1491 San Ignacio De Loyola was born in the Basque province of Guipuzcoa, Spain. His parents were Marranos and at the time of his birth the family was very wealthy. As a young man he became a member of the Jewish Illuminati Order in Spain. As a cover for his crypto Jewish activities, he became very active as a Roman Catholic… In 1539 he had moved to Rome where he founded the 'Jesuit Order…'"
[End Excerpt]
(Note that "Marranos were baptized Jews in Spain who were suspected of secretly holding to their Talmudic or Kabbalistic Jewish beliefs.)
Noting the presence of Jewish men in high ranks among the Jesuits from the time of their founding, some are contending that the Jesuits themselves are controlled by occult and Illuminati Jews. Thus the rabbit trail goes a bit deeper. My point is that it is difficult to establish a hierarchy and to declare definitively that one Luciferian group controls the others. What is more certain is that Satan is behind them all, for the Bible describes him as "the god of this world."
So while I acknowledge that the Jesuits exert a profound influence upon this world, I am led to advise restraint in making confident assertions about one group playing the role of puppet master to others. Satan is the ultimate puppet master.
Regarding the subject of Historicism which you broached, I would repeat my statement that any eschatological doctrine is far too broad of a subject to address in a comment field, and it is off-topic from the series in which you are commenting. This is why I questioned whether it was the Spirit of Christ leading you to post the comment.
Perhaps your thought was that since this series is dealing with massive deception on a global scale that it was fitting to speak about another very large deception. I can appreciate that. But, as I mentioned, when asserting a deception it is necessary to give evidence of it, and this is far too large of a doctrinal issue to prove in an comment field. I do not align myself with the Preterist, Futurist, or Historicist views. Neither do I believe the Protestant fathers you have mentioned had it right. Some of these men, such as Calvin, were exceptionally deluded men, and did great harm to the body of Christ and the reputation of the Christian faith. If you are not familiar with Calvin's dealings with Michael Servetus, I invite you to look it up.
I personally find much to disagree with in what are described as "the five points of Calvinism." I think particularly the doctrine of "Limited Atonement" has done great harm to the body of Christ. This is a doctrine I have refuted in the book "God's Plan of the Ages."
Joseph
Hi
Have just found your site.
One thing about the moon landings is that the burden of proof should be on those who claim that humans have set foot there not the other way round.
cheers