Joseph Herrin (08-13-2017)
The magazines and modern media are doing a good job mixing up the sexes. No more are people known by their birth certificates and what gender parts they were born with. They are now told that they are whatever they want to be. There is a glaring deception however. If a child or adult says they are a different sex than their birth certificate even once, then it is against the law to attempt to dissuade them of this fact no matter what. In other words, you can cast a person into confusion, but never attempt to take the confusion away from a person.
The cover of the January 2017 National Geographic features a nine year old boy sitting down pretending to be a girl. The quoted byline for the piece says, “The best thing about being a girl is, now I don’t have to pretend to be a boy.” Yet, he does have to pretend to be a girl. What boy would not. Boys do not have the same gender as a girl. What will they know about having a period, nurturing children, going through menopause, or a host of other things. Nine year old boys do not know such things.
The boy they have pictured on the cover is a prepubescent male. He doesn’t know anything about being an adult. It is very easy to get boys and girls at this age and change them into the opposite sex. The boys haven’t started growing facial hair. They haven’t had the first sexual awakening. They don’t know what it is to be attracted to a young woman. Get them on hormone therapy to overcome their genetic make-up and they will be forever stalled between boy and girl. But they still won’t be able to bear children.
In the Bible we see things quite a bit different.
So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. Then God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth…”
This first chapter of Genesis is a shortened version of the second chapter. In the first chapter we read of all things being created, therefore the first chapter has to show how man was made. At the end of the first chapter the woman is mentioned, but how she came about is not. We have to go to the second chapter to find how she was made.
And Yahweh God caused a deep sleep to fall on Adam, and he slept; and He took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh in its place. Then the rib which Yahweh God had taken from man He made into a woman, and He brought her to the man. And Adam said: “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; She shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.” Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh. And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.
It is obvious from this account that the male and female are set from birth. By taking a man and a woman, the two were able to have children. Adam and Eve had a large number of children and they knew from the moment they were born whether they would be male or female.
Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, “I have acquired a man from the Lord.” Then she bore again, this time his brother Abel.
After he begot Seth, the days of Adam were eight hundred years; and he had sons and daughters.
How many sons and daughters could Adam have had since he lived to be 930 years? The other families on the earth all came from the seed of Adam. Undoubtedly Adam had dozens of children.
Almost of the children in National Geographic are nine years old. There is a couple reasons for this. The magazine is training men and women to not be able to postulate whether there children are male or female until they tell them. They are being trained to think it is mere assumption to declare a child’s sexuality based upon their birth. How can anyone think that a male can carry a baby in the womb they do not have?
Another reason, and it is yet a future reason, is that boys are being prepared for being sexual toys for the men that will rape them. By getting them on hormone therapy they will be prepared for sex with any man who desires them. The North American Man/Boy Love Association is one of the oldest associations for abolishing the laws against pederasty and pedophilia. Since 1997 it has been the largest group of its kind. It works to abolish age of consent laws that criminalize sex with minors. In 1997 a book written by Joshua Gamson titled Messages of Exclusion: Gender Movements and Symbolic Boundaries included the following for NAMBLA.
NAMBLA said, “man/boy love is by definition homosexual,” that “the Western homosexual tradition from Socrates to Wilde to Gide … [and] many non Western homo sexualities from New Guinea and Persia to the Zulu and the Japanese” were formed by pederasty, that “man/boy lovers are part of the gay movement and central to gay history and culture,” and that “homosexuals denying that it is ‘not gay’ to be attracted to adolescent boys are just as ludicrous as heterosexuals saying it’s ‘not heterosexual’ to be attracted to adolescent girls.”
National Geographic is a key piece of literature to proclaim the allure of young boys to men. First they will get it legalized to have these young boys and girls declare what sexuality they are, and then they will remove all legal barriers to sexual relations between men and children. What child would not be impressed by the monetary and other gifts an adult could give them?
National Geographic includes a picture of a boy jumping on the trampoline. Also, that is his mother sitting in back of the trampoline. They both listened to a show on the radio that spoke of a person declaring themselves to be a different sex and they were moved by it. The boy on the trampoline said he was a girl four years ago, and recently the mother said she was a male.
In the book Push Back! A Christian Response to the Radical Homosexual Agenda I wrote the following.
As vile and detestable as homosexual behavior is, sin will seek to manifest in ever increasing ways.
Yesterday a sister posted a comment on the Parables Blog and provided a link to the following article.
Pedophiles want same rights as homosexuals
by Jack Minor
Using the same tactics used by “gay” rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals.
Critics of the homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became acceptable to identify homosexuality as simply an “alternative lifestyle” or sexual orientation, logically nothing would be off limits. “Gay” advocates have taken offense at such a position insisting this would never happen. However, psychiatrists are now beginning to advocate redefining pedophilia in the same way homosexuality was redefined several years ago.
In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. A group of psychiatrists with B4U-Act recently held a symposium proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders of the APA.
B4U-Act calls pedophiles “minor-attracted people.” The organization’s website states its purpose is to, “help mental health professionals learn more about attraction to minors and to consider the effects of stereotyping, stigma and fear.”
In 1998 The APA issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”
Pedophilia has already been granted protected status by the Federal Government. The Matthew Shephard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act lists “sexual orientation” as a protected class; however, it does not define the term.
Republicans attempted to add an amendment specifying that “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation;” however, the amendment was defeated by Democrats. Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fl) stated that all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law. “This bill addresses our resolve to end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans, regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these ‘philias’ and fetishes and ‘isms’ that were put forward need not live in fear because of who they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this rule…”
Earlier this year two psychologists in Canada declared that pedophilia is a sexual orientation just like homosexuality or heterosexuality.
Van Gijseghem, psychologist and retired professor of the University of Montreal, told members of Parliament, “Pedophiles are not simply people who commit a small offense from time to time but rather are grappling with what is equivalent to a sexual orientation just like another individual may be grappling with heterosexuality or even homosexuality.”
He went on to say, “True pedophiles have an exclusive preference for children, which is the same as having a sexual orientation. You cannot change this person’s sexual orientation. He may, however, remain abstinent…”
Dr. Quinsey, professor emeritus of psychology at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, agreed with Van Gijseghem. Quinsey said pedophiles’ sexual interests prefer children and, “There is no evidence that this sort of preference can be changed through treatment or through anything else.”
In July, 2010 Harvard health Publications said, “Pedophilia is a sexual orientation and unlikely to change. Treatment aims to enable someone to resist acting on his sexual urges.”
Linda Harvey, of Mission America, said the push for pedophiles to have equal rights will become more and more common as LGBT groups continue to assert themselves. “It’s all part of a plan to introduce sex to children at younger and younger ages; to convince them that normal friendship is actually a sexual attraction.”
Milton Diamond, a University of Hawaii professor and director of the Pacific Center for Sex and Society, stated that child pornography could be beneficial to society because, “Potential sex offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex against children…”
The IASHS lists, on its website, a list of “basic sexual rights” that includes “the right to engage in sexual acts or activities of any kind whatsoever, providing they do not involve nonconsensual acts, violence, constraint, coercion or fraud.” Another right is to, “be free of persecution, condemnation, discrimination, or societal intervention in private sexual behavior” and “the freedom of any sexual thought, fantasy or desire.” The organization also says that no one should be “disadvantaged because of age.”
We are seeing this coming into maturity now. Not only have mainstream magazines like National Geographics gotten behind this, but so has Planned Parenthood. Two months ago Planned Parenthood released some new instructions on how to speak to your 3 or 4 year old preschooler. It had information in it on how to tell if your child was transgender.
Transgender means you identify with a different gender from the one you were assigned at birth. Gender nonconforming means your gender identity or expression doesn’t go along with traditional ideas of just male or female — it could mean you identify with words like non-binary, genderqueer, or something else. Some adults use words like “gender expansive” or “gender creative” to describe children with non-binary gender expressions. While we don’t know for sure how many people are transgender, recent research shows that about 1% of people in the U.S. identify as transgender, more than 1.5 million people…
While the most simple answer is that girls have vulvas and boys have penises/testicles, that answer isn’t true for every boy and girl. Boy, girl, man, and woman are words that describe gender identity, and some people with the gender identities “boy” or “man” have vulvas, and some with the gender identity “girl” or “woman” have penises/testicles. Your genitals don’t make you a boy or a girl. You can say that most girls have vulvas and most boys have penises/testicles. You may want to emphasize that it doesn’t matter too much what parts someone has—that doesn’t tell you much about them. But you can make that decision based on your values and how you plan to talk with your kid about gender as they grow up.
This explanation is rubbish. It is written by baby killers to bring further confusion to the children of America. Can you see yourself explaining this subject to a 3 or 4 year old. The material is meant to confuse parents as well as the child. Why not go with the Biblical definition and tell your child that they are what their gender parts make them?
Planned Parenthood is not a godly source of information, and neither are the magazines. Consider the statements of Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, from a section of the book Dragon Flood.
One of the chief proponents of Eugenics in America was Margaret Sanger. Many recognize her as being the founder of Planned Parenthood. It was formerly called The American Birth Control League. If any doubt that the ultimate goals of Planned Parenthood are other than the goals of Eugenics, to lower the number of undesirables in the population, they need only look at where the majority of Planned Parenthood’s clinics are located. They are in areas of high populations of poor and ethnic races.
According to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, more than 43 percent of African-American pregnancies end in abortion. Although African-Americans represent only 12 percent of the American population, they account for almost 35 percent of all abortions. In Mississippi, for example, while African-Americans represent only 37 percent of the population, they account for 73 percent of the state’s abortions. More than 78 percent of Planned Parenthood’s abortion centers are in or near minority communities.
Abortions are much more common among minority women in the U.S. In 2000-2001, the rates among black and Hispanic women were 49 per 1,000 and 33 per 1,000, respectively, vs. 13 per 1,000 among non-Hispanic white women.
Margaret Sanger is championed as a pioneer of women’s reproductive rights. The truth is that she was a racist, a bigot, and held to abominable views about the sanctity of human life. Following are a few of her own statements.
We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities (Sounds like a description of Barack Obama). The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
[Source: Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble. Original source: Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon’s Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976]
Today eugenics is suggested by the most diverse minds as the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.
I think you must agree … that the campaign for birth control is not merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical with the final aims (sounds like ‘final solution’) of eugenics… Birth control propaganda is thus the entering wedge for the eugenic educator.
As an advocate of birth control I wish… to point out that the unbalance between the birth rate of the ‘unfit’ and the ‘fit,’ admittedly the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes. In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feebleminded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation.
On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.
[Source: Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5]
…Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying… demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism… [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant … We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.
[Source: Margaret Sanger. The Pivot of Civilization, 1922. Chapter on “The Cruelty of Charity,” pages 116, 122, and 189. Swarthmore College Library edition]
The people are giving themselves directly into the hands of the ones who would abase and corrupt them. Is it any wonder that National Geographic was a magazine that fully embraced and spread the lie of man having landed on the moon and returned to earth nearly 50 years ago?
This magazine has been full of lies for years. It is supported by lying companies.
I ask you, “Who should you listen to, Yahweh the creator of all the Universe, or sinful and lying mankind?” Who should you consult to know what gender your child is?
It is imperative that Christian parents look to the ways of God. All other ways will end in death.
Heart4God Website: http://www.heart4god.ws
Parables Blog: www.parablesblog.blogspot.com
P.O. Box 804
Montezuma, GA 31063